MN HIV Services Planning Council Meeting
Council Members Present:
|
|
Randy Hornstine
|
Dean Halland
|
Dan Chapouch
|
LeMonte Graham
|
|
Antonio Marante |
Lee Lewis
|
Bob Hansen
|
Pat Kramme
|
Jim Lawser
|
Ama
|
Gwen Velez
|
Susanne Pfeil
|
Gary Novotny
|
John Cyzon
|
Sarah Senseman
|
Rae Eden Frank
|
Paul Eknes-Tucker
|
Francis Mark
|
Aaron Keith Stewart
|
Ephraim Olani
|
Andy Ansell
|
Eric Meininger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Council Members Absent:
|
|
Lois Crenshaw (LOA)
|
Gilbert Achay (Unexcused)
|
|
Ron Schut
(Excused) |
Willie Wesley (Unexcused)
|
|
|
|
|
Consultant: |
|
|
Becky
Kroll |
|
|
|
|
|
Guests: |
|
|
Luisa Pessoa-Brando |
Oju Olagbaju |
|
|
|
|
G-HAT: |
|
Jonathan Hanft
|
Julie Hanson Perez
|
Dave Rompa
|
Eduardo Parra
|
Redwan Hamza
|
|
|
|
|
Staff:
|
|
Lori Lippert
|
Wendi Kistner
|
I. Welcome
and introductions; lighting of the candle
The meeting was called to order
at
II. Review
the minutes and proposed agenda
Ama
III. Open Forum
No items
IV. Co-chairs Update, Andy Ansell and
Aaron Keith Stewart
Andy Ansell gave a report on his recent lobbying trip to
This
was the final meeting for retiring Council members Randy Hornstine
and Paul Eknes-Tucker. The Council recognized and
thanked them for their contributions.
Co-chairs
are working with Title I grantee on filling Planning Council Coordinator
position. This hiring process will be the
first test to see how the new MOU works.
Andy and Aaron are confident on the process for hiring.
V. Staff Update, Lori Lippert
Wendi
Kistner has been hired to fill the Administrative Specialist position
previously held by Mary Dwyer.
Lee
Lewis is Chair of the Housing Coalition and invited Lori to come to a meeting
last month. Lori attending this meeting
and gave an overview of the Planning Council.
They are interested in keeping in communication with the Council. Lori recommends that the Planning Council
co-chairs, CCHAP, and the leaders of the Housing Coalition meet three times per
year. No vote was taken but general
agreement with this idea was expressed by Council members.
At
each meeting there will be a sign-in sheet.
Sign in so PC staff can keep accurate records.
VI. Committee
written reports
A.
Please refer to written reports for
CVC and Needs Assessment & Evaluation.
B.
Operations Committee, Jim Lawser, committee co-chair
·
Council Member Election – Committee reported on its
nomination process. In order to maintain
representativeness, only one new member is being
nominated. There were not enough
applicants that met Council’s representation needs. Jim reminded members that PC by-laws were
recently amended to allow term limits to be suspended for members who represent
other CARE Act Titles (which have required representation on the Council) if no
other candidates are available. Thus
Sarah Senseman was nominated, even though this would
be her third term. Election was held and
Oju Olagbaju and Sarah Senseman were elected.
·
A brief plea for recruiting new candidates for the
September election was made. A handout
regarding HRSA’s rules regarding
representation has been included in today’s packet. Thirty-three percent of Council members need
to be “unaligned consumers”.
C.
Planning and Priorities Committee
1.
Prioritization and Allocation
(P&A) Kick-Off! – This month marks the beginning of the training process
for prioritization and allocation.
a)
Overview of P&A responsibilities
·
Legislative requirements –
(Jonathan & Lori) Six factors need to be considered in prioritization: size
and demographics of the epidemic; cost and outcome effectiveness of each
service; priorities of the community; coordination between services; availability
of other governmental and nongovernmental resources; and, capacity development
needs resulting from disparities. The
prioritization and allocation process is a legal responsibility and it is very
important to follow this process because we are held liable for this process.
·
How this activity fits in with the whole of
Council responsibilities – (Andy) Andy reviewed overview of all
Council responsibilities.
·
Explanation of MAI funds – (Aaron
Keith) MAI stands for Minority AIDS Initiative.
This is money within the Title I and Title II grants that is set-aside
to go to agencies that serve the needs of minority communities. Aaron Keith explained the difference between
MAI and “culturally appropriate” service categories (which is a
Q: Are MAI
funds separate from the total funds we get?
A: It is
part of the total grant, but it is a “set-aside” which means it can only got to
‘MAI eligible’ services..
Q: Will the Council prioritize them at the same
time?
A: Yes,
there will be a separate prioritization sheet for MAI funds and a separate
allocation process held on the same day as the rest of the allocations.
Q: How is the MAI amount determined?
A: It’s
based on a formula by Congress. MAI funds are only 6% of the total award
amount, but it is not the only money that the Council allocates to services for
people of color.
Q: What is meant by saying the agencies that
are minority-operated get “special consideration” for MAI funding.
A:
Congress did not make it a strict requirement that MAI funds go to
minority-operated services, but strongly encourages it. In
Q: Is MAI is specifically for African
Americans?
A: No,
the MAI is for all communities of color.
Our own needs assessments in
Q: Why aren’t Native Americans included in the
list of funded services?
A: The
providers on the list came through the granting process. It could be that providers that serve Native
Americans did apply or they applied and were not selected. Also, those agencies that got MAI funds are
not the only agencies that got funding. There
are programs that provide services to Native Americans that get CARE Act
funding but they may not receive MAI funds. Remember, MAI funds support only a
fraction of the services in
Q: How are the target
populations determined?
A: The
Needs Assessment and Evaluation committee determines which populations will be
target in the granting process.
b)
Introduction to P&A process
·
Process from here to August – (Dan Capouch) Dan reviewed the entire P&A process. In August there will be two Planning Council
meetings to do allocations: August 8th,
·
How we do P&A (practice sheets) – (Paul)
Prioritization and allocation are two different processes and there are
different focuses for each. The focus
for prioritization is which services are most important (don’t think about the
budget, just the relative importance of each service). The focus of allocation is how much money
should be distributed to each service.
Prioritization forms will be handed out after the June Planning Council
meeting and everyone will have two weeks to get them back to the Planning
Council staff. Results will be shared at
the July Planning Council meeting. Then at the August Planning Council meeting
we will focus on the allocation of funds.
It is important to remember that the ranking on the list does
automatically determine the level of funding for a service. (It doesn’t mean that the top rankers get the
most money.) The money a service area
receives is based on how much money it takes to provide the service, if there
are other sources of funding for the service, etc.
·
ACTION ITEMS
·
ACTION ITEM: Approval of
Allocations Process (Francis) – Planning &
Priorities committee developed this process for doing allocations (very similar
to the process two years ago). The
Executive committee recommends approval of this item. Approved by unanimous consent
·
ACTION ITEM: Approval of Budget
Principles and Criteria (Francis) – Planning &
Priorities committee developed these principles/criteria for doing allocations
(very similar to those used two years ago). These are the guidelines that the
Council will follow in making allocations decisions. The biggest change from two years ago is the
2% funding increase to all services across the board. There have been no cost-of-living or
inflationary increases to providers in the last three years. The Executive committee recommends approval
of this item. Approved by unanimous
consent.
·
ACTION ITEM: Approval of list of
MAI eligible service areas – (Francis)
Planning & Priorities committee developed this
list of services that will be eligible for MAI funding (one item out of the
list of five is changed from two years ago). Health insurance counseling has
been removed from the list because in the past is it wasn’t being
utilized. Health Education and Risk
Reduction has been added as a replacement.
The Executive committees recommends approval of
this item. Approved by unanimous
consent.
VII. Epidemiology Training, Luisa
Pessoa-Brando, MDH
2004 data
is what is being presented on. 2005 data
will be available in June. Presentation
handouts will be given at the next Planning Council meeting.
VIII. Title I Update, Jonathan
Hanft,
o
Staffing Update – Jonathan
gave update on progress of interviews and invited members to hear presentations
by the finalist candidate(s).
o
Notice of Grant Award Delayed – We
don’t expect to see the grant award funds until after the fiscal year ends in
March.
o
Technical Assistance Update – HRSA
denied our request for TA. Jonathan is
going to appeal.
o
Expenditure Report (3rd quarter) – Totals
include carryover funding which is usually spent during the last few months of
the year. Someone asked for clarification
on the mental health funding. Virtually
no funds have been spent but there appear to be billing difficulties. DHS and HC are working on straightening out
billing and access problems. There will
be trainings for providers.
o
Upcoming trainings –
Quality Management Training for Providers: Part 4, Feb 17th
IX.
Title II and ADAP update, Dave Rompa, MN Dept of Human Services
The Title II representatives left
the Planning Council meeting early because of a previous engagement. No update on Title II and ADAP was given.
X.
Announcements, evaluation, next
agenda
·
Discussion of meeting space. RMBC has decided to raise their rates from $50
to $200 per session. Planning Council staff have been looking at other spaces that meet our
needs. Please pay close attention to the
next meeting notice as the location may change.
·
Ama has asked that all supplemental materials be
emailed to Planning Council members after the meeting so members don’t need to
keep paper copies of the extra handouts.
Meeting adjourned at
Meeting Summary:
·
Randy Hornstine and Paul Eknes-Tucker attended
their final Planning Council meeting today.
·
Wendi Kistner was hired to fill the
Administrative Specialist position for the Planning Council.
·
Oju Olagbaju was voted
on as a Planning Council member. Sarah
Senseman will continue as a Planning Council Member for another year.
·
ACTION ITEM: The allocation process was approved.
·
ACTION ITEM: The budget principles and criteria was approved.
·
ACTION ITEM: The list of MAI eligible service areas was
approved.
·
The final two or three candidates for the Planning Council Coordinator
will give a presentation at the next Executive Committee meeting. Any Planning Council member who is interested
in attending can do so.
Documents distributed at or before the meeting:
·
Agenda
·
Minutes from
·
Background on Minority AIDS Initiative
·
Meeting summaries for CVC and Needs Assessment committee meetings
·
Action items for 2006 allocation process; 2006 MAI funding services; and
2006 requirements, values and criteria to guide prioritization and allocations
process
·
MAI funding 1999-2005
·
Service activities funded with MAI money
·
2002-2005 allocations
·
Prioritization and allocation process guide
·
Proposed allocations process
·
MN HIV Planning Council duties
·
Forced choice sheet
·
Action item for member election and member reappointment
·
Personal statement of nominated candidate
·
Appointment ballot
·
Prioritization and allocation plan from here to August
·
3rd Quarter financial report
·
Title I requirements for priority setting and resource allocation
·
Title I update
·
Priority setting and resource allocation (six things to consider)
Planning Council office
612-596.7894, or toll-free 888-638-3224 – web address is
www.mnhivplanningcouncil.org
MDH’s website address for Epi data
is www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/diseases/hiv/index.html
or call 612-676-5414
WK