MN HIV Services
Planning Council Meeting
Council Members Present:
|
Council Members Absent:
|
Gilbert Achay
|
Lois Crenshaw
|
Andy Ansell
|
John Cyzon |
|
Dan Capouch |
Rae Eden Frank – Excused
|
Paul Eknes-Tucker
|
LeMonte Graham
|
Dean Halland
|
Andrea Jenkins
|
Bob Hanson
|
Patrick Kramme
|
Randy Hornstine
|
Lee Lewis
|
Jim Lawser
|
Antonio Marante – LOA
|
Francis Mark
|
Ephraim Olani - Excused
|
Eric Meininger
|
Ron Schut
|
Gary Novotny
|
|
Susan Pfeil
|
|
Sarah Sensemen
|
|
Aaron Keith Stewart
|
|
Gwendolyn Velez
|
|
Willie Wesley
|
|
Ama Sabah
|
|
|
Consultant: |
Becky Kroll - CLEAR |
|
|
|
|
Guests: |
|
|
Kathleen Clarke Anderson – Congressman Sabo’s
office |
|
|
|
|
|
G-HAT: |
|
Julie Hanson
Perez - MDH
|
Deborah
Riley – DHS
|
Joe Freesmeier –
|
Eduardo Parra –
|
John Schur –
|
|
|
|
|
Staff:
|
|
Lori Lippert
|
Jennifer
Fisher
|
I. Welcome and introductions; lighting of the candle
The meeting was called to
order at
II. Review the minutes and proposed agenda
Minutes were accepted with
changes by unanimous consent.
Agenda was accepted with
changes by unanimous consent.
III. Open Forum
Jim Lawser reviewed the new
meeting evaluation form. Aaron Keith suggested another question added
to the evaluation regarding feedback for the Planning Council Co-chairs. There were no objections. Evaluations should be filled out after every
PC meeting and given to staff.
IV. Co-chairs Update
Co-chairs will be meeting
next week with the co-chairs of CCCHAP (the community planning group for HIV
prevention services).
V. Staff
Update
·
Facilitation training
is scheduled for the
·
Comp Plan has
been submitted to HRSA. Copies
available.
Copies are available and
will be sent out to all the titles and upon request as well. Everyone should have received this electronically. Contact staff if you want a paper copy.
The AIDS Housing Coalition
is interested in establishing communication with the Planning Council. Lori Lippert will be meeting with them. It
was suggested that the Planning Council set up a meeting with Prevention and
Housing every 6 months. Lori will see if
we can get minutes from them and will send our minutes to them.
VI. Committee written reports;
time for questions, discussion
A.
Community Participation Committee
Didn’t meet this month
B.
Needs Assessment and Evaluation Committee
·
Needs Assessment Plans for 2006
The committee has developed a 3-year plan. They have decided what they are going to do
for the next year in the context of looking at the next 3 years.
1st year (2006) – phase 1 & phase II
Phase
I - (scheduled
to be completed by July for Prioritization) Consists of a brief consumer survey,
working mostly through service providers and also a survey of various service
systems, using mostly existing data and key informant interviews. (i.e. housing,
mental health, primary care, etc.)
Phase
II – is a more
in-depth look at systems. (i.e. primary care) NA&E committee will pick systems to be
studied and try to identify the gaps and barriers in those systems.
We know what the needs are but don’t know if the way
we are designing and providing services is really addressing those needs. Where is the breakdown? We can’t move ahead until we find the problem
in the system that is causing the barriers.
The goal is to better understand how CARE Act funds might be used to
supplement or leverage other funds in the most effective way possible.
C.
Planning and Priorities Committee
·
ACTION ITEM: Approval of Prioritization Process
Dan
Capouch went over the ‘Action Item: 2006 Prioritization and Allocation Schedule’
and the ‘Prioritization Schedule - 2006’ handout with the Planning
Council.
The
most important responsibilities for Planning Council are prioritizing services and
allocating funds to them. This is done
once every two years. The Council was
asked to approve the process for doing the prioritization developed by the
P&P committee and recommended by the Executive committee.
MOTION: Andy made a motion to pass the
Prioritization Schedule. It was seconded and a vote taken. The prioritization schedule was accepted with
15 votes to accept and none opposed.
Question: How will the MAI be prioritized?
Answer: A separate
prioritization ballot will be used with the services that are eligible for MAI
funding. The Council will vote in
February on what services those will be.
Allocations of MAI services will happen on the same day as the rest of
the allocations but will be done in its own process.
Comment: The 2005 epi data won’t be available until after
April. No one anticipates any big
changes in the data from 2004 to 2005 and it would be helpful for new council
members to have the training as scheduled.
MDH can give a brief update on 2005 data after it is available, to
identify any important trends. There was
general agreement expressed that it would be better to go ahead with the epi
training early in the process, using 2004 data.
·
ACTION ITEM: Approval of Service Area/Activity Definitions
Staff
apologized for not having paper copies of the service definitions here today
but it has been sent out to everyone electronically. The document was sent out to all Council
members for review and input. Changes
are being made from the list used two years ago in order to bring the
organization in line with the way HRSA categorizes services. This will be the final list used to determine
what service activities will be prioritized and eligible for allocations.
Suggestion
made to add ‘pharmacists’ to list of providers under clinical consultations - ambulatory outpatient care.
Question: What’s the
difference between benefits counseling under ‘client advocacy’ and health insurance
counseling under ‘health insurance’? Why
do they appear in two different service areas?
Answer: They are
funded under different service definitions because they differ: Benefits counseling can cover a wide range of
benefits counseling, such as private disability insurance, Medicare, Social
Security, etc. The focus is largely on
decision-making regarding employment. Health
insurance counseling is specifically focused on helping people get and maintain
coverage for medical care.
Question: Why is herbal
medicine specifically excluded under ‘food bank/home delivered meals’ but it is
listed as an allowed service under ‘other support services-complementary care’?
Answer: This reflects
HRSA guidelines. HRSA will not allow
funds allocated for “food” to be used for herbal supplements, but it does allow
some limited use of complementary care funds to be used for herbal medicines. The latter require a physician’s referral.
The
Council has always chosen to prioritize some services that it doesn’t actually
allocate funds to (because there are other sources of funding for those
services), in order to show that we recognize its importance. For example we have
used State funding and to cover some of the cost of the insurance programs
& left it on the list even though we haven’t used Title I funds because we
want to make sure we show that we highly value that service.
MOTION: Dan Capouch moved to approve
the Service Area/Activity Definitions, Bob Hanson 2nd the
motion. The Service definitions were
passed; 16 concur and no one opposed.
D.
Operations Committee
Attendance records were passed out to council members.
Jim reviewed the Attendance policy, attendance tracking sheet and point
system. Two columns will be added to the
attendance sheet indicating 1st or 2nd term and additional
committees/meetings. Members were asked to provide any corrections to their
record to Jennifer Fisher or Lori Lippert in writing. Attendance will be reviewed every 3 months
for corrections and to make sure everyone understands the records.
Operations will discuss which meetings count for
extra points on attendance. Council
members attending extra meetings are responsible for sending this information
to Planning Council Staff so it can be credited to the records.
E.
Community Voice Committee – no December meeting
VII. Title
I update, Eduardo Parra
·
PC Staff Hiring
Update
Coordinator
position – applications are received until Friday, January 13th.
Administrative Specialist – posting closes Friday, January 13th as
well.
·
MOU Finalized
·
Reallocation of
funds from Cost-share Assistance to Health Insurance
Since the reallocation is happening within the same
service activity this can be done administratively without a Council vote. So this item is just for the Council’s
information (no vote required). The grant manager met with the provider many
times to try to understand the reason funds are not being spent and the
provider continues to work on spending remaining funds on this service.
Cost-share assistance is significantly
underspending. Funds were reallocated to
the insurance program in an attempt to buffer the short-fall of funds. The portion
of ADAP funds that are used on the health insurance program ran out before the
end of the fiscal year. They are now
funding the program with drug rebate dollars. This reallocation is helping to supplement
that funding source to make it through the fiscal year.
·
Upcoming Quality
Management Trainings
Quality Improvement Plan Part 4 takes place Feb 17th
Friday at
VIII. Title II and ADAP update, Deb Riley, DHS
·
Medicare Part D
Medicare
Part D went into effect at the beginning of the year. All Medicare recipients need to fill out Social
Security forms to determine their income bracket and if they are eligible for
subsidies.
Pushing
everyone they can to get on Medicare part D program. Trying to get Medicare supplement plans to
the MCHA programs. They are saying their
costs will increase and some legal maneuvering going on to try not to let those
people come on.
There
have been significant problems with people accessing prescriptions with
pharmacies as the computer records with all the providers are not ready with
all the eligibility information. Some
DHS clients have reported being charged up to $250 for medications. One problem
DHS has encountered is the computer systems are not accepting the DHS contribution
to the cost or are otherwise rejecting clients that they shouldn’t be.
·
Gilead Pharmaceutical
Company is challenging the federal mandate that they give rebates for HIV
medications. As a form of protest, the
DHS HIV/AIDS Programs is not allowing its staff to attend any local meeting the
If
Next month DHS will report on the cost share program.
IX.
Announcements,
evaluation, next agenda
·
African American
AIDS Task Force has moved its office to
·
·
Next month will
be Randy and Paul’s last month on the council.
Meeting adjourned at
Meeting Summary:
·
New
meeting evaluations forms being used, starting with this meeting.
·
Needs
Assessment and Evaluation committee presented its plans for the upcoming year’s
(and beyond) needs assessment activities.
·
ACTION ITEM: Prioritization Process approved
·
ACTION ITEM: Service Area/Activity Definitions for
prioritization approved
·
·
DHS
gave update on the start-up of Medicare Part D
Documents
distributed at or before the meeting:
·
Agenda
·
Committee
Reports
·
Minutes
from
·
2006
Meeting Schedule
·
Attendance
Policy
·
Planning
Council Attendance Sheet
·
ACTION
ITEM: 2006 Prioritization & Allocations Schedule
·
ACTOPM
ITEM: Service Area/activity Definitions for 2006 Prioritization
·
Prioritization
Schedule for 2006
·
Meeting
Evaluation
·
Attendance
Report (to Committee Members only)
Planning Council office
612-596.7894, or toll-free 888-638-3224 – web address is
www.mnhivplanningcouncil.org
MDH’s website address for
Epi data is www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/diseases/hiv/index.html
or call 612-676-5414
JF/lgl